July 11, 2019, Just down the street. Red-tailed hawks have lived in my neighborhood for years but they have been stubbornly elusive when I’m out with a camera. One day last week I went out to get the mail and I heard hawk cries nearby. Several different voices. I looked up, into a tree and there they were. Three of them.
I dashed inside and got the beast — eight pounds of camera body and lens. While I was inside, the birds arranged themselves so that I couldn’t get all three in one shot. But this one sat alone on a branch, very interested in what I was doing.
(Nikon D500, Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6 ED VR zoom. RAW processing in DxO PhotoLab 2.3; Editing in Adobe Photoshop.)
How lovely that you were able to get such a detailed photo of the hawk!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Liz. I have to thank the hawk for this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice portrait, Michael. I don’t have the glass for shooting birds but do know how heavy a lens like that can be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Wildlife photography is its own integrated exercise program.
LikeLike
Great stuff, Michael, very nice! A
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. All that and upper-body exercise too!
LikeLike
beautiful portrait Michael!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Margot!
LikeLike
The photo is magnificent but I’m more in awe of how close you must have gotten even with a long lens. Kudos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. They were high in the tree and I had to get back a bit for a clear angle. I’d guess about 130 feet. Dirty secret: I enlarged the image 1.5 times using Topaz AI Gigapixel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t worry your secret is safe with me. Didn’t seem to hurt the quality of the image at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Happy staredown to you both.
Have you considered one of the recent lightweight point-and-shoot or so-called bridge cameras with huge optical zoom ranges that you could keep around just for pictures like this? The image quality wouldn’t match the beast’s but you’d gain a lot in ease and maneuverability.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. The super zoom bridge cameras just don’t have the image quality. To get the zoom range, they pack 16–20 million pixels into tiny 1/2.3 sensors. This means a lot of noise at even moderate ISO and the lenses aren’t very sharp. I use the beast around home and on road trips. For air travel and long hikes I use a Tamron 100–400 which is much lighter and smaller but still has impressive performance. Some of my more recent wildlife posts were shot with the Tamron.
LikeLike
Wow!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks!
LikeLike
Such a wonderful gaze…he’s looking right at you 👍💫☺️ have a creative day Michael ~ smiles Hedy
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Magnificent creature. I will have a creative day, and may you have one too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍🤓☺️ I will!
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a look 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good thing I’m too big to be lunch!
LikeLike
Eye-to-eye always is a wonderful experience, whether with a bird like this, a deer, a spider, or a dragonfly. The world’s creatures are far more aware of us than many realize, and they’re often just as curious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel a definite line of communication when we have these eye-to-eye experiences. At various places on this blog there are many: bobcat, coyote, hawks, crow, hummingbirds… In all of these creatures, there is a “there” there.
LikeLike
The eyes are really fantastic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. I must say it is slightly unnerving to be looked at so intently by a predator. But mostly, in those eyes, I see intelligence.
LikeLike
That is true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are they large hawks? Not sure we have them in the UK (probably not). I have an outstanding argument with a hawk from earlier today (it went after one of my favourite small birds, a young dunnock) but I will admit that this one is very beautiful. Maybe it was hoping the camera was a mouse?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Red tailed hawks are in North America only
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-tailed_hawk
I hope your argument went well. This one thought the camera was a black object pointed in its direction. It didn’t particularly like it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The little bird was heard later, but I didn’t see it, unfortunately, so it may have been a relation. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person