Roses, like lilies, bloom as they are. But some stand out. And, as with lilies, gilding is superfluous.
(Nikon D850, AF-S Micro NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8. RAW processing in DxO PhotoLab 2.3; Editing in Adobe Photoshop.)
More fine art photography at www.amagaphoto.com
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
The AuthorMichael Scandling
California based fine-art photographer featuring abstract, impressionist, and minimalist seascapes — near and distant — and floral-based images.
Fine-art photography can be seen at www.amagaphoto.com
All original images on this blog are copyright 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Michael Scandling. All rights reserved. No images on this site may be copied, duplicated, reused, published, or re-purposed in any way without express permission from the copyright owner, Michael Scandling.
AMAGA Photography Blog 
like a wedding flower
💕🌼
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I didn’t think of it that way, but I agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did you hesitate about darkening the traces of green that remained in the lower left?
Somehow the expression “gild the lily” is the expression that coalesced in communal memory. However, what Shakespeare had Salisbury say in King John was:
Therefore, to be possess’d with double pomp,
To guard a title that was rich before,
To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw a perfume on the violet,
To smooth the ice, or add another hue
Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light
To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish,
Is wasteful and ridiculous excess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I agree with Salisbury. The collective “we” seem to have altered the phrase over the years. I reduced the blacks in the RAW development and the greens ended up where you see them. I did not take them down any further because I think they enhance the image. They are a sort of echo.
LikeLike
I I like like echoes echoes..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes yes yes…
LikeLike
Yes. It’s a rose.
Excellent photo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
I’ve recently just started to shoot flowers (again) and, I have to say, it’s extremely satisfying. Roses have a beautiful simplicity and that may be a challenge to produce a compelling image. This one’s gorgeous!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much. Roses are a favorite as they do tend to lend them selves to Florascapes and abstracts. This one, however, really wanted to be seen in its completeness.
LikeLike
It does look like a finely done wedding cake decoration…or a complex scoop of ice cream. Either way or any other way it’s a lovely little portrait.
LikeLike
And it’s so tasty too! Rosawhiteaphotomin,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lovely! Well, no gilding needed, but you and The Steves could form a Flower Photography Guild! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, sir. The difference is that I am only an occasional flower photographer.
LikeLike
This one is quite perfect Michael. No assist needed by Mother Nature at her finest
LikeLiked by 1 person
Often best to let Mommy Nature just do her thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A more ‘standard’ green would have reduced the effect, I think. The deep blue-green adds to the essential elegance of the image, rather than nudging it toward the mundane as more typical rose leaves might have done.
As for gilding, I agree that where nature’s involved, it’s usually superfluous. I’m no John Ashbery (thank goodness, actually) but I did ponder the same issue a couple of years ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, a more standard green would’ve rushed to the fore and dominated the rose. When one is dealing with delicacy, it is best to stay delicate.
I find myself in a paradox of agreeing completely about gilding nature being superfluous, while very often gilding nature to an extreme degree in creating my abstractions. But perhaps it’s not a paradox at all: if Nature had not provided me with a beautiful color or form or rhythm, there would be nothing to abstrct. And in the end, all I am doing is emphasizing a detail of what she has provided.
Thank you very much for directing me to your post, most beautiful, and introducing me to the Etheree. Yours is a perfect introduction and has inspired me to play with the form.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been thinking about this, and at last remembered the 1960s and early 1970s, when in certain circles it was quite the fashion to take a bit of nature — a leaf, a sand dollar, a scallop shell — and dip it into either ‘gold’ or ‘copper’ to create jewelry.
That’s how I’ve always thought of gilding: adding something extraneous and not necessarily related to the object being gilded at all. Your work with these white roses is quite the opposite. Instead of adding something that wasn’t there in the beginning, you’re enhancing, or abstracting, what lies at the heart of the flower itself: form, color, and so on.
In a sense, it’s the difference between so many social media photos and the work that you, Steve, and Steve do. There’s nothing wrong with layering on filter after filter in the various programs that are available, but the result usually is a world away from those you achieve.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much. You’ve nailed it twice in one day. The main thing I try to do is simplify. Always.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such beautiful flora 🌷
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks very much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And there she is! No wonder she inspired so many stunning images! Or maybe they were her relatives…no matter, they are all wonderful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The first three were relatives. No matter. Thank you very much!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gorgeous! Super edit …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you kindly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, what a click! Amazing shot 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! And thank you for the follow.
LikeLike
Pingback: AMAGA Blog — Just a Year Ago Today – AMAGA Photography Blog